Hey Everyone,
I wanted to let everyone know what has happened.
The case was dismissed and we are allowed to refile. It has been 6 months and finally, we know the outcome.
Essentially, the judge concluded that even though Bouzy’s claims were false we did not have enough to show actual malice.
We had to show that Bouzy knew what he was saying was false but said them anyway.
As an example when Bouzy claimed that I was not a lawyer, this statement alone was not enough to sue for defamation.
But we believed that when Bouzy later claimed that he knew I was a lawyer when he claimed I was not, this was enough to show actual malice.
The court stated:
"He (Bouzy) also admitted that, when he made an earlier claim about not being able to find any record of Plaintiff practicing law, he “already had the information” but was “waiting for someone else to tweet it” so he would not be accused of inappropriately sharing Plaintiff’s real name on social media."
The court then reasoned that:
“Defendant, referencing back to an earlier tweet in which he said there was “no history of him practicing” and that “[m]aybe the name he is using isn’t his real name,”stated that he “already had the information.” (Id.) This statement does not demonstrate that Defendant knew at the outset that Plaintiff was in fact a lawyer under another name. Moreover, it is unclear what “information” he had—assuming that the information was Plaintiff’s real name, Defendant’s statement that there was “no history of him practicing” is still substantially true with regard to the social media persona he was apparently referencing.”
With this, the court has allowed us to refile and we are considering it. We believe the court got it wrong but we respect the court decision. Defamation cases are notoriously hard to win but we gave it our best shot.
I am sad at this outcome but as a menthoned there are no sure things when you go to court. We are doing our homework and will let you know what we plan to do moving forward.
Thank you all.
Nate
A TikTok illegal migrant who flaunted welfare cash and called Americans “stupid” has just been DEPORTED! Leonel Moreno, a Venezuelan migrant, gained online fame by bragging about receiving U.S. government benefits while flashing stacks of cash. He openly mocked hardworking Americans, calling them “idiots” while urging other illegal migrants to take advantage of the system.
His arrogance finally caught up to him when authorities deported him back to Venezuela. His outrageous behavior even caused an uproar on a flight, further sealing his fate. Many are celebrating his removal as a major victory for immigration enforcement, especially under Trump’s policies.
Should illegal migrants who abuse the system be deported immediately? Comment below and share your thoughts! Don’t forget to LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for more breaking news and viral updates!
🔔 TURN ON NOTIFICATIONS to stay updated!
Need a lawyer?
If you or someone you know has been injured in an accident, don’t hesitate to ...
And We’re Back!
And we're back, y'all. I appreciate every single one of you supporting the channel right here behind the paywall. You get the raw receipts, the surveillance breakdowns, and the unfiltered legal analysis before the public algorithms try to throttle the reach, shadowban the facts, or bury the story.
Knocking on the Wrong Door at Night
Today, we are taking a trip up to Chester in Orange County, New York, and the surveillance footage on this one is crazy, y'all!
We are looking at John C. Riley, the elected Town Highway Superintendent and a federally licensed firearms dealer (FFL).
On the night of May 2, 2024, a 24-year-old delivery driver named Alpha Barry was trying to drop off food, but his phone died. Unable to pull up his GPS, he went door-to-door looking for directions and asking to charge his phone.
When he knocked on Riley’s door, Riley screamed at him to get off his property. Barry turned around, walked down the driveway, got back inside his vehicle, and turned on the ignition to drive away.
That should ...
And We’re Back!
And we're back, y'all. I appreciate every single one of you supporting the channel right here behind the paywall. You get the raw receipts, the procedural breakdowns, and the unfiltered legal analysis before the public algorithms try to throttle the reach, shadowban the facts, or bury the story.
The Big Update: Motion for New Trial DENIED
Today, we are closing the loop on the latest development in the Karmelo Anthony murder case out of Collin County, Texas, and the legal reality is crazy, y'all!
As you know, Anthony's legal team successfully got the original trial judge recused over comments made in a TV interview, and a new judge stepped in to review the defense's Motion for a New Trial.
The defense based their motion heavily on two points:
That the trial courtroom was improperly closed to the public at certain points.
That the pre-trial "gentleman's agreement" to exclude prior bad acts violated Anthony's constitutional right to testify in his own defense.
Well, the ruling just came down: the judge officially ...
And We’re Back!
And we're back, y'all. I appreciate every single one of you supporting the channel right here behind the paywall. You get the raw receipts, the unredacted files, and the actual evidentiary breakdown before the mainstream algorithms try to throttle the reach, shadowban the facts, or bury the story.
The Trial "Gentleman's Agreement" Explodes
Today, we are diving right back into the Karmelo Anthony murder case out of Collin County, Texas, and the 75-page evidentiary dossier that just got unsealed is crazy, y'all!
During the murder trial—where Anthony was convicted of stabbing 17-year-old Austin Metcalf to death at a high school track meet and sentenced to 35 years—the defense and prosecution had what’s known as a "gentleman's agreement." Both sides agreed to keep out prior bad acts from both the victim and the defendant so the jury wouldn't get completely prejudiced.
Now, Anthony’s new defense team is arguing for a new trial, claiming their client was blocked from testifying because prosecutors threatened to ...
