Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are allegedly demanding a place on the Buckingham Palace balcony during King Charles’ coronation — and an acknowledgment during the festivities of their two young kids, according to a report.
The requests, and the couple’s apparent holding out until their wishes are granted, may throw the historic event into “chaos,” royal insiders fear.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex — who recently received their invitations to the May 6 ceremony — are still mulling over whether or not they will make the 5,459-mile-long trip.
If they do go, the exiled royals will be met with a “cold shoulder” from senior members of the royal family, according to a report.
Harry and Meghan are mainly concerned at the role for their kids — Prince Archie, who will turn 4 the day his grandfather is crowned king, and Princess Lilibet, 1, a source close to the palace told OK! Magazine.
It’s believed Archie and Lilibet have not been invited to attend the coronation, which reportedly didn’t go down too well with the exiled royals.
“The palace is trying to wrap up negotiations as quickly as possible because they can’t go right up to the wire. It could lead to chaos,” an insider told the outlet.
“However, what the Sussexes are pushing for is for them to be included with the rest of the family at the Palace later that day,” the insider added.
“It’s also Prince Archie’s birthday on Coronation day so they would like some kind of nod to that at a lunch or drinks reception. Even if it’s just a happy birthday mention.”
The absence of the two youngsters from the event had “never been a bone of contention,” according to the source, because of the “restlessness and tantrums” typical of small children.
Harry and Meghan are also reportedly pushing to be included on the Buckingham Palace balcony on the big day — a royal protocol reserved strictly for working members of the royal family only.
“It could very well be that it ends in stalemate and they won’t attend. But the palace is doing everything in its power to not let that happen.”
Charles is set to be formally crowned on May 6, a date fans believe was chosen specifically to cause a conflict for the Sussexes and Archie’s birthday.
Meanwhile, leaked plans revealed Prince William’s children are expected to take part in the coronation, The Times reports.
George, 9, Charlotte, 7, and Louis, 5, are set to join their parents Prince William and Kate Middleton in a carriage behind a Gold State Coach transporting the King and Queen, plans seen by the outlet show.
The coronation drama is the latest sign of discord among the royals since the Sussexes stepped down as senior members of the royal family in 2020.
The move resulted in conflict and bad blood and was what ultimately led to their absence from the palace balcony at the late Queen’s Platinum Jubilee celebrations last summer.
https://nypost.com/2023/03/18/harry-meghans-demands-be-chaos-at-king-charles-coronation/
A Florida police officer tried to steal a dead man's house—and almost got away with it!
In this video, we break down the wild legal case of Lauderhill Police Officer Brian Louis Sguros. After responding to a welfare check in 2022 for 71-year-old Dennis West, who had passed away from natural causes, Officer Sguros told the medical examiner that West had no surviving family, claimed his body, and moved his own family straight into the two-story home.
Using Florida's adverse possession (squatter's rights) laws, Sguros spent over $214,000 renovating the property, paid the taxes in West's name, and allegedly forged the dead man's signature and used his ID to pull building permits. He only needed to live there for 7 years to own it outright—but after 3.5 years, West's real heirs sold the house. Instead of leaving quietly, Sguros actually SUED the new owners to get his renovation money back, exposing his entire scheme and landing himself in handcuffs facing multiple felony charges.
👇 What do...
The Cornell 7 lawsuit named the wrong man—and Jane Doe’s lawyers have now dropped him. But is that mistake really the biggest problem with this case?
I’m Nate the Lawyer, and I’m breaking down why I believe the more serious issue is the discrepancy between Jane Doe’s signed police statement and the allegations in her civil lawsuit.
According to the records discussed in this video, Jane Doe reviewed her six-page police statement, made 20 edits, and signed it under penalty of perjury. How does that account compare with the lawsuit filed nearly two years later—and what could those differences mean for her credibility?
In this video:
• Why naming the wrong defendant doesn’t establish whether the underlying allegations are true.
• Why Jane Doe’s sworn statement matters—and my disagreement with LegalEagle’s coverage.
• How her text messages fit into the competing accounts.
• The dispute over what Cornell’s president actually said.
• The distinction between the ...
He arrived in America undocumented, became a U.S. citizen, and was elected mayor. Now, federal prosecutors say he misused more than $1.5 MILLION in pandemic relief loans—and he’s facing 26 criminal charges across two separate cases.
Lawrence, Massachusetts, Mayor Brian DePeña supported ICE targeting criminals in his community. Then the FBI arrested him.
In this video, Nate the Lawyer breaks down DePeña’s rise to office, the controversy over his English and use of a translator, and the allegations that COVID relief money went toward his campaign, personal tax debts, and mortgages.
And the federal case is only part of the story. Massachusetts prosecutors also charged him with distributing an illegally recorded conversation and witness intimidation. DePeña has pleaded not guilty and refuses to resign.
How did this become two criminal cases—and what happens next?
Watch the clips, follow the allegations, and tell me: Should a mayor facing charges like these step aside while the ...
And We’re Back!
And we're back, y'all. I appreciate every single one of you supporting the channel right here behind the paywall. You get the unvarnished analysis, the procedural realities, and the raw legal breakdowns before the mainstream algorithms try to throttle the reach, shadowban the facts, or bury the story.
The Inside Story of an 11-to-1 Jury Room
Today, we are diving into the exclusive sit-down interview with three jurors from the Lindsay Clancy trial who finally broke their silence—and what went down in that deliberation room is crazy, y'all!
Now, the public saw a hung jury mistrial. But when these jurors walked through what actually happened during deliberations, it wasn't some evenly divided debate over the facts.
It was 11 to 1 for Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity.
Eleven jurors were ready to sign the forms committing her to a state psychiatric facility. And the lone holdout? The other jurors revealed that he actually admitted during deliberations that he had reasonable doubt, but refused to vote not ...
And We’re Back!
And we're back, y'all. I appreciate every single one of you supporting the channel right here behind the paywall. You get the raw receipts, the unredacted files, and the unfiltered legal analysis before the algorithms try to throttle the reach, shadowban the facts, or bury the story.
The Narrative Completely Collapse
Today, we are diving right back into the Karmelo Anthony murder case out of Texas, and the newly leaked text messages published in full context by the Daily Mail are completely crazy, y'all!
Quick recap: Karmelo Anthony was convicted of murder and sentenced to 35 years in prison for fatally stabbing 17-year-old Austin Metcalf in the chest at a track meet. The internet immediately turned this into a massive, racially charged civil rights crusade. Activists rallied, social media commentators took up arms, and an online GiveSendGo fundraiser hauled in over $630,000 for his defense before it was pulled from public view.
Now, his legal team and family have launched a brand-new $250,000 legal defense ...
And We’re Back!
And we're back, y'all. I appreciate every single one of you supporting the channel right here behind the paywall. You get the raw receipts, the procedural breakdowns, and the unfiltered legal analysis before the algorithms try to throttle the reach, shadowban the facts, or bury the story.
The Mirror-Image Case Nobody Talked About
Today, we are looking at a case out of Linn County, Iowa, that is an absolute mirror image of the Lindsay Clancy tragedy—and the legal outcome on this one is crazy, y'all!
For the past year, social media and the legal commentary circuits have been arguing one specific talking point: "If a MAN had strangled his children and claimed psychosis or mental breakdown the way Lindsay Clancy did, he would be convicted of First-Degree Murder and sent to prison for life in two seconds flat."
Well, a man did do it. Almost a year after Lindsay Clancy strangled her three children in Massachusetts, 45-year-old insurance executive Matthew Schlier strangled his 5-year-old son, Jack, to death in Marion, ...
