Chris Rock is ready to talk smack about Will Smith.
In his live Netflix comedy special Selective Outrage, the comedian tore into the King Richard actor nearly one year after being slapped by him on stage at the 2022 Oscars. Most of Rock's jokes on the subject came at the end of the special, and he quipped that he was "smacked by Suge Smith."
"People are like, 'Did it hurt?'" Rock said. "It still hurts! I got 'Summertime' ringing in my ear!"
Rock rejected the notion that he and Smith had been "fighting," noting the actor is "significantly bigger" than him and joking, "Will Smith does movies with his shirt off. You've never seen me do a movie with my shirt off."
Smith slapped Rock over a joke about his wife, Jada Pinkett Smith, having a bald head. But Rock continued that "I had nothing to do with that s--t" and "I didn't have any entanglements," referring to an infamous episode of Pinkett Smith's talk show Red Table Talk where she discusses having a relationship with singer August Alsina that she described as an "entanglement."
"We've all been cheated on," Rock joked. "Everybody in here has been cheated on. None of us have ever been interviewed by the person that cheated on us on television. ... She hurt him way more than he hurt me."
Rock continued that Smith hitting him was "some b---h a-- s--t" and that he did "nothing" to Smith, adding that Pinkett Smith "started this" when she wanted him to "quit his job" hosting the 2016 Oscars because her husband wasn't nominated amid the #OscarsSoWhite backlash. "I have rooted for Will Smith my whole life," Rock said, "...and now I watch Emancipation just to see him get whooped." Smith plays a runaway slave in Emancipation. But Rock also said he's "not a victim" and that fans will "never see me on Oprah or Gayle crying."
Rock's special streamed live on Netflix just over a week before the 2023 Oscars, which Smith won't attend after being banned from the ceremony for 10 years.
https://theweek.com/culture/1021535/chris-rock-will-smith-oscars-slap-netflix-special
A TikTok illegal migrant who flaunted welfare cash and called Americans “stupid” has just been DEPORTED! Leonel Moreno, a Venezuelan migrant, gained online fame by bragging about receiving U.S. government benefits while flashing stacks of cash. He openly mocked hardworking Americans, calling them “idiots” while urging other illegal migrants to take advantage of the system.
His arrogance finally caught up to him when authorities deported him back to Venezuela. His outrageous behavior even caused an uproar on a flight, further sealing his fate. Many are celebrating his removal as a major victory for immigration enforcement, especially under Trump’s policies.
Should illegal migrants who abuse the system be deported immediately? Comment below and share your thoughts! Don’t forget to LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for more breaking news and viral updates!
🔔 TURN ON NOTIFICATIONS to stay updated!
Need a lawyer?
If you or someone you know has been injured in an accident, don’t hesitate to ...
I’ve been digging deep into the latest files, and the paperwork I just pulled up is absolutely blinding. Today, I am pulling back the curtain on a massive public relations illusion, and the data completely demolishes the official story. The people running this show genuinely thought they could operate in the shadows, rewrite the narrative on the fly, and expect nobody to actually check their math. But y'all know me—I always check the math! When I put their official public statements side-by-side with the actual sworn filings, the whole story completely unraveled.
Let me tell you how the law works: the rules of evidence and due process are not optional guidelines that people get to ignore whenever it becomes inconvenient for their preferred narrative. You cannot simply weaponize the legal system or withhold crucial facts just because the actual data doesn't fit the story you want to tell. When you build a case on bad faith actions and procedural shortcuts, the law views that as fruit ...
I’ve been going through the latest court dockets, and the paperwork I just pulled up is absolutely blinding. I am looking at a scenario where the people running the show thought they could operate in the shadows, rewrite the narrative on the fly, and expect nobody to check their math. But I always check the math. When I matched their official public statements against the actual sworn filings, the whole story completely unraveled. Bad actors are getting caught on the record contradicting themselves and bending the rules just to protect their own interests.
Let Me Tell You How the Law Works
Let me tell you how the law works: the rules of evidence and due process are not mere suggestions. You cannot simply weaponize the legal system or withhold crucial facts just because the actual data doesn't fit the story you want to tell. When you build a case on bad faith actions and procedural shortcuts, the law views that as fruit from a poisonous tree. You take out that rotten foundation, and the ...
I am breaking down a textbook example of institutional overreach, and the files I just uncovered are crazy, y'all. I have been tracking these specific files closely, and the physical legal documents I just pulled up are absolutely blinding. What started as a standard procedure has officially turned into a situation where bad actors inside the system are completely abusing their authority, fabricating an internal narrative, and rewriting enforcement rules on the fly just to insulate themselves from accountability.
Where the Receipts Get Loud
But here is where the evidence gets incredibly loud, y'all. They genuinely thought they could run this entire playbook behind closed doors, keep the public completely blind, and quietly bury the underlying data. But when I sync up the official timeline and put the actual public records side-by-side, the inconsistency is staggering. They are explicitly caught on the record violating their own established protocols, contradicting their previous public ...