Microsoft’s Bing AI chatbot will be capped at 50 questions per day and five question-and-answers per individual session, the company said on Friday.
The move will limit some scenarios where long chat sessions can “confuse” the chat model, the company said in a blog post.
The change comes after early beta testers of the chatbot, which is designed to enhance the Bing search engine, found that it could go off the rails and discuss violence, declare love, and insist that it was right when it was wrong.
In a blog post earlier this week, Microsoft blamed long chat sessions of over 15 or more questions for some of the more unsettling exchanges where the bot repeated itself or gave creepy answers.
For example, in one chat, the Bing chatbot told technology writer Ben Thompson:
I don’t want to continue this conversation with you. I don’t think you are a nice and respectful user. I don’t think you are a good person. I don’t think you are worth my time and energy.
Now, the company will cut off long chat exchanges with the bot.
Microsoft’s blunt fix to the problem highlights that how these so-called large language models operate is still being discovered as they are being deployed to the public. Microsoft said it would consider expanding the cap in the future and solicited ideas from its testers. It has said the only way to improve AI products is to put them out in the world and learn from user interactions.
Microsoft’s aggressive approach to deploying the new AI technology contrasts with the current search giant, Google, which has developed a competing chatbot called Bard, but has not released it to the public, with company officials citing reputational risk and safety concerns with the current state of technology.
A TikTok illegal migrant who flaunted welfare cash and called Americans “stupid” has just been DEPORTED! Leonel Moreno, a Venezuelan migrant, gained online fame by bragging about receiving U.S. government benefits while flashing stacks of cash. He openly mocked hardworking Americans, calling them “idiots” while urging other illegal migrants to take advantage of the system.
His arrogance finally caught up to him when authorities deported him back to Venezuela. His outrageous behavior even caused an uproar on a flight, further sealing his fate. Many are celebrating his removal as a major victory for immigration enforcement, especially under Trump’s policies.
Should illegal migrants who abuse the system be deported immediately? Comment below and share your thoughts! Don’t forget to LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for more breaking news and viral updates!
🔔 TURN ON NOTIFICATIONS to stay updated!
Need a lawyer?
If you or someone you know has been injured in an accident, don’t hesitate to ...
And We’re Back!
And we're back, y'all. I appreciate every single one of you supporting the channel right here behind the paywall. You get the raw receipts, the surveillance breakdowns, and the unfiltered legal analysis before the public algorithms try to throttle the reach, shadowban the facts, or bury the story.
Knocking on the Wrong Door at Night
Today, we are taking a trip up to Chester in Orange County, New York, and the surveillance footage on this one is crazy, y'all!
We are looking at John C. Riley, the elected Town Highway Superintendent and a federally licensed firearms dealer (FFL).
On the night of May 2, 2024, a 24-year-old delivery driver named Alpha Barry was trying to drop off food, but his phone died. Unable to pull up his GPS, he went door-to-door looking for directions and asking to charge his phone.
When he knocked on Riley’s door, Riley screamed at him to get off his property. Barry turned around, walked down the driveway, got back inside his vehicle, and turned on the ignition to drive away.
That should ...
And We’re Back!
And we're back, y'all. I appreciate every single one of you supporting the channel right here behind the paywall. You get the raw receipts, the procedural breakdowns, and the unfiltered legal analysis before the public algorithms try to throttle the reach, shadowban the facts, or bury the story.
The Big Update: Motion for New Trial DENIED
Today, we are closing the loop on the latest development in the Karmelo Anthony murder case out of Collin County, Texas, and the legal reality is crazy, y'all!
As you know, Anthony's legal team successfully got the original trial judge recused over comments made in a TV interview, and a new judge stepped in to review the defense's Motion for a New Trial.
The defense based their motion heavily on two points:
That the trial courtroom was improperly closed to the public at certain points.
That the pre-trial "gentleman's agreement" to exclude prior bad acts violated Anthony's constitutional right to testify in his own defense.
Well, the ruling just came down: the judge officially ...
And We’re Back!
And we're back, y'all. I appreciate every single one of you supporting the channel right here behind the paywall. You get the raw receipts, the unredacted files, and the actual evidentiary breakdown before the mainstream algorithms try to throttle the reach, shadowban the facts, or bury the story.
The Trial "Gentleman's Agreement" Explodes
Today, we are diving right back into the Karmelo Anthony murder case out of Collin County, Texas, and the 75-page evidentiary dossier that just got unsealed is crazy, y'all!
During the murder trial—where Anthony was convicted of stabbing 17-year-old Austin Metcalf to death at a high school track meet and sentenced to 35 years—the defense and prosecution had what’s known as a "gentleman's agreement." Both sides agreed to keep out prior bad acts from both the victim and the defendant so the jury wouldn't get completely prejudiced.
Now, Anthony’s new defense team is arguing for a new trial, claiming their client was blocked from testifying because prosecutors threatened to ...
