Twitter Inc. has shut two of its three India offices and told its staff to work from home, underscoring Elon Musk's mission to slash costs and get the struggling social media service in the black.
Twitter, which fired more than 90% of its roughly 200-plus staff in India late last year, closed its offices in the political center New Delhi and the financial hub of Mumbai, people aware of the matter said.
The company continues to operate an office in the southern tech hub of Bengaluru that mostly houses engineers, the people said, declining to be identified as the information is private.
Billionaire Chief Executive Officer Musk has fired staff and shut offices around the world as part of an effort to get Twitter financially stable by late 2023. Yet India is regarded as a key growth market for US tech giants from Meta Platforms Inc. to Alphabet Inc.'s Google, which are making long-term bets on the world's fastest-growing internet arena. Musk's latest moves suggests he's attaching less importance to the market for now.
Twitter has evolved in past years into one of India's most important public forums, home to heated political discourse and Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 86.5 million followers. Yet revenue there isn't significant for Musk's company, which also has to contend with strict content regulations and increasingly savvy local competition.
An exodus of workers - many of whom were fired - since Musk's acquisition has raised concerns about whether Twitter can sustain its operations and regulate content. Musk this week said he may need till the end of the year to stabilize the company and make sure it's financially healthy.
Since the $44 billion buyout, Twitter has failed to pay millions of dollars in rent for its San Francisco headquarters and London offices, been sued by multiple contractors over unpaid services, and auctioned off everything from bird statues to espresso machines to raise money.
Musk has also openly floated the idea of bankruptcy, and cited a "massive drop" in revenue as advertisers fled over concerns about Twitter's ability to weed out undesirable content. The platform has also experienced significant glitches and outrages, most recently just this month.
A TikTok illegal migrant who flaunted welfare cash and called Americans “stupid” has just been DEPORTED! Leonel Moreno, a Venezuelan migrant, gained online fame by bragging about receiving U.S. government benefits while flashing stacks of cash. He openly mocked hardworking Americans, calling them “idiots” while urging other illegal migrants to take advantage of the system.
His arrogance finally caught up to him when authorities deported him back to Venezuela. His outrageous behavior even caused an uproar on a flight, further sealing his fate. Many are celebrating his removal as a major victory for immigration enforcement, especially under Trump’s policies.
Should illegal migrants who abuse the system be deported immediately? Comment below and share your thoughts! Don’t forget to LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for more breaking news and viral updates!
🔔 TURN ON NOTIFICATIONS to stay updated!
Need a lawyer?
If you or someone you know has been injured in an accident, don’t hesitate to ...
I’ve been digging deep into the latest files, and the paperwork I just pulled up is absolutely blinding. Today, I am pulling back the curtain on a massive public relations illusion, and the data completely demolishes the official story. The people running this show genuinely thought they could operate in the shadows, rewrite the narrative on the fly, and expect nobody to actually check their math. But y'all know me—I always check the math! When I put their official public statements side-by-side with the actual sworn filings, the whole story completely unraveled.
Let me tell you how the law works: the rules of evidence and due process are not optional guidelines that people get to ignore whenever it becomes inconvenient for their preferred narrative. You cannot simply weaponize the legal system or withhold crucial facts just because the actual data doesn't fit the story you want to tell. When you build a case on bad faith actions and procedural shortcuts, the law views that as fruit ...
I’ve been going through the latest court dockets, and the paperwork I just pulled up is absolutely blinding. I am looking at a scenario where the people running the show thought they could operate in the shadows, rewrite the narrative on the fly, and expect nobody to check their math. But I always check the math. When I matched their official public statements against the actual sworn filings, the whole story completely unraveled. Bad actors are getting caught on the record contradicting themselves and bending the rules just to protect their own interests.
Let Me Tell You How the Law Works
Let me tell you how the law works: the rules of evidence and due process are not mere suggestions. You cannot simply weaponize the legal system or withhold crucial facts just because the actual data doesn't fit the story you want to tell. When you build a case on bad faith actions and procedural shortcuts, the law views that as fruit from a poisonous tree. You take out that rotten foundation, and the ...
I am breaking down a textbook example of institutional overreach, and the files I just uncovered are crazy, y'all. I have been tracking these specific files closely, and the physical legal documents I just pulled up are absolutely blinding. What started as a standard procedure has officially turned into a situation where bad actors inside the system are completely abusing their authority, fabricating an internal narrative, and rewriting enforcement rules on the fly just to insulate themselves from accountability.
Where the Receipts Get Loud
But here is where the evidence gets incredibly loud, y'all. They genuinely thought they could run this entire playbook behind closed doors, keep the public completely blind, and quietly bury the underlying data. But when I sync up the official timeline and put the actual public records side-by-side, the inconsistency is staggering. They are explicitly caught on the record violating their own established protocols, contradicting their previous public ...
