The DC Studios bosses shared 10 projects, talked the exit of Henry Cavill and addressed the potential future of Ezra Miller as the Flash as they introduced a slate of big heroes and lesser-known characters. "The stakes are massive for us and for Warner Bros. Discovery," says Safran.
A new Batman movie without Robert Pattinson (but featuring Bruce Wayne’s murderous son). A Superman movie on the release schedule (mark your calendars for July 11, 2025). A Game of Thrones-style drama set on Wonder Woman’s home island of Themyscira (Amazonian palace intrigue). And an animated series already in production (Creature Commandos … wait, what?).
That’s just part of what will be coming to theaters and TV screens as part of DC Studios bosses James Gunn and Peter Safran’s new slate.
The pair have been busy in the three months since taking over and combining the film and television slate of DC properties, including live-action and animation as well as gaming. They revamped the way the movie and TV sides do business, cutting ties with projects and creators. A writers room was formed to find an overall story that will launch a unified DC Universe. Creators have been approached. And a plan — at least part of one for what is being billed as Chapter 1: God and Monsters — was formulated, and a slate of projects put into development.
Now, after ambitiously promising fans that they would have something to show them by Feb. 1, Gunn and Safran have unveiled the first part of their slate. It’s a combination of big, well-known heroes along with lesser-known characters — who may just become big, like the once-obscure heroes of Gunn’s Guardians of the Galaxy films over at Marvel Studios. The duo shared their plans Monday with reporters in a petite and tidy screening room on the Warner Bros. lot in Burbank.
“One of our strategies is to take our diamond characters — which is Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman — and we use them to prop up other characters that people don’t know,” explained Gunn.
Added Safran, “To build those lesser known properties into the diamond properties of tomorrow.”
While plans may yet shift, cautioned the duo, here is the initial slate of projects for Chapter 1, in the order they’re planned to appear.
Creature Commandos: A seven-episode animated series, written by Gunn, that is already in production. Originally a team of classic monsters assembled to fight Nazis, this is a modern take on the concept. The voice actors have yet to be cast, but the executives are looking to find people who can voice the animated characters and also portray the live-action versions when the antiheroes show up in movies and series.
Waller: In a spinoff of Gunn’s own HBO Max hit series Peacemaker, Viola Davis will return as the ruthless and morally ambiguous head of a government task force. It is being written by Christal Henry (Watchmen) and Jeremy Carver, the creator of the Doom Patrol TV series.
Superman: Legacy: The movie featuring the Man of Steel that Gunn is writing and may direct, although no commitments on that end have been made. While the two previous titles are meant to be “aperitifs,” in Safran’s words, Superman is the true kick-off for the duo’s DCU plans. “It’s not an origin story,” Safran said. “It focuses on Superman balancing his Kryptonian heritage with his human upbringing. He is the embodiment of truth, justice and the American way. He is kindness in a world that thinks that kindness is old-fashioned.” A release date of July 11, 2025, has been penciled in.
Lanterns: Greg Berlanti’s long-in-the-works Green Lanterns TV series has been scrapped (and Gunn and Safran have parted ways with the longtime DC series steward). In its place will be a new take on the space cops with power rings. “Our vision for this is very much in the vein of True Detective,” Safran described. “It’s terrestrial-based.” It will feature prominent Lantern heroes Hal Jordan and John Stewart and is one of the most important shows they have in development. “This plays a really big role in leading into the main story we are telling across film and TV.”
The Authority: A movie based on a team of superheroes with rather extreme methods of protecting the planet that first originated in the late 1990s under an influential imprint known as Wildstorm, run by artist and now head of DC publishing Jim Lee. “One of the things of the DCU is that it’s not just a story of heroes and villains,” said Gunn. “Not every film and TV show is going to be about good guy versus bad guy, giant things from the sky come and good guy wins. There are white hats, black hats and gray hats.” Added Safran: “They are kinda like Jack Nicholson in A Few Good Men. They know that you want them on the wall. Or at least they believe that.”
Paradise Lost: The duo describe this HBO Max series as a Game of Thrones-style drama set on the all-female island that is Wonder Woman’s birthplace, Themyscira, filled with political intrigue and scheming between power players. It takes place before the events of the Wonder Woman films.
The Brave and the Bold: “This is the introduction of the DCU Batman,” said Gunn, “of Bruce Wayne, and also introduces our favorite Robin, Damian Wayne, who is a little son of a bitch.” The movie will take inspiration from the now-classic Batman run written by Grant Morrison that introduced Batman to a son he never knew existed: a murderous tween raised by assassins. “It’s a very strange father-and-son story.”
And, importantly, it will feature a Batman not played by Robert Pattinson. However, there is also …
The Batman sequel: Pattinson will continue to portray the Dark Knight in at least one more crime saga movie directed by Matt Reeves. That movie, the executives revealed, will be released Oct. 3, 2025, and is being titled The Batman Part II.
“2025 is going to be a very big year for DC,” crowed Safran. “Superman and Batman within the same year.”
Booster Gold: An HBO Max series based on a unique, lesser-known hero created in 1986. Safran said of the series, “It’s about a loser from the future who uses basic future technology to come back to today and pretend to be a superhero.” Gunn described it as “imposter syndrome as superhero.”
Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow: Taking its cues from the recent Tom King-written miniseries, this movie promises a different take than what most think of when Superman’s cousin comes to mind. “We will see the difference between Superman, who was sent to Earth and raised by loving parents from the time he was an infant, versus Supergirl, raised on a rock, a chip off of Krypton, and who watched everyone around her die and be killed in terrible ways for the first 14 years of her life and then come to Earth. She is much more hard-core and not the Supergirl we’re used to.”
Swamp Thing: A horror film that promises to close out the first part of the first chapter.
Can the U.S. government strip a sitting congresswoman of her citizenship—and then deport her? The investigation into Ilhan Omar raises an extraordinary legal question: does the government have a case that could actually get her removed from the country?
I’m Nate the Lawyer, and I break down the potential legal path from U.S. Congress to deportation. We examine how Omar obtained her citizenship, why her family’s immigration records could become central to the investigation, and why the marriage allegations dominating the headlines may not be the deciding issue.
There are two potential legal theories—and both require the government to prove much more than a suspicious timeline or an inconsistent record. I explain those theories, the evidence they would require, and the legal hurdles between an investigation and a successful challenge to her citizenship.
A federal search is not a finding of fraud. The question is whether the government can prove the case.
⏱️ CHAPTERS
00:00 Federal raid: ...
What did Jane Doe originally tell police—and how does that compare with the allegations in her Cornell 7 lawsuit?
In this video, I compare her original sworn police statement, as reproduced in the Tompkins County District Attorney's public statement, with her civil complaint. We examine the accounts side by side: consent, intoxication, alleged force, drug use, requests to stop, and who allegedly did what.
Which differences are direct conflicts? Which are omissions, added details, or changes in how an event is described? And why do those distinctions matter?
I walk through the passages and explain my analysis so you can evaluate the documents for yourself. We also examine text messages discussed in the video and how they fit into the comparison.
The lawsuit contains allegations, not findings of fact. My conclusions and opinions are identified as commentary.
Which difference matters most to you—and why? Leave the timestamp in the comments.
#Cornell7 #NateTheLawyer #LegalAnalysis
00:00 ...
One night. A sworn statement. A later lawsuit. How do the accounts compare?
The Cornell 7 allegations have sparked national outrage. In this video, I compare Jane Doe’s original sworn statement, as presented by the district attorney, with the allegations in her civil lawsuit and examine the differences involving consent, intoxication, force, and what happened inside the fraternity house.
We start with the law, walk through the timeline, and evaluate the evidence. I also examine the recorded conversation, Sunny Hostin’s comments on The View, and one male participant’s claim that Jane Doe assaulted him.
What actually conflicts? What requires more context? And how should those differences affect our assessment of the allegations?
Credibility matters. So does applying the same standard to both sides.
CHAPTERS
00:00 The Cornell 7 controversy
00:46 How we’ll evaluate the evidence
01:09 Two competing assault claims
01:55 New York law and intoxication
02:57 Sunny Hostin weighs in
04:07 The ...
And We’re Back!
And we're back, y'all. I appreciate every single one of you supporting the channel right here behind the paywall. You get the unvarnished analysis, the procedural realities, and the raw legal breakdowns before the mainstream algorithms try to throttle the reach, shadowban the facts, or bury the story.
The Inside Story of an 11-to-1 Jury Room
Today, we are diving into the exclusive sit-down interview with three jurors from the Lindsay Clancy trial who finally broke their silence—and what went down in that deliberation room is crazy, y'all!
Now, the public saw a hung jury mistrial. But when these jurors walked through what actually happened during deliberations, it wasn't some evenly divided debate over the facts.
It was 11 to 1 for Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity.
Eleven jurors were ready to sign the forms committing her to a state psychiatric facility. And the lone holdout? The other jurors revealed that he actually admitted during deliberations that he had reasonable doubt, but refused to vote not ...
And We’re Back!
And we're back, y'all. I appreciate every single one of you supporting the channel right here behind the paywall. You get the raw receipts, the unredacted files, and the unfiltered legal analysis before the algorithms try to throttle the reach, shadowban the facts, or bury the story.
The Narrative Completely Collapse
Today, we are diving right back into the Karmelo Anthony murder case out of Texas, and the newly leaked text messages published in full context by the Daily Mail are completely crazy, y'all!
Quick recap: Karmelo Anthony was convicted of murder and sentenced to 35 years in prison for fatally stabbing 17-year-old Austin Metcalf in the chest at a track meet. The internet immediately turned this into a massive, racially charged civil rights crusade. Activists rallied, social media commentators took up arms, and an online GiveSendGo fundraiser hauled in over $630,000 for his defense before it was pulled from public view.
Now, his legal team and family have launched a brand-new $250,000 legal defense ...
And We’re Back!
And we're back, y'all. I appreciate every single one of you supporting the channel right here behind the paywall. You get the raw receipts, the procedural breakdowns, and the unfiltered legal analysis before the algorithms try to throttle the reach, shadowban the facts, or bury the story.
The Mirror-Image Case Nobody Talked About
Today, we are looking at a case out of Linn County, Iowa, that is an absolute mirror image of the Lindsay Clancy tragedy—and the legal outcome on this one is crazy, y'all!
For the past year, social media and the legal commentary circuits have been arguing one specific talking point: "If a MAN had strangled his children and claimed psychosis or mental breakdown the way Lindsay Clancy did, he would be convicted of First-Degree Murder and sent to prison for life in two seconds flat."
Well, a man did do it. Almost a year after Lindsay Clancy strangled her three children in Massachusetts, 45-year-old insurance executive Matthew Schlier strangled his 5-year-old son, Jack, to death in Marion, ...
