The European Parliament today voted overwhelmingly in favor of enforcing USB-C as a common charging port across a wide range of consumer electronic devices, including the iPhone and AirPods, by the end of 2024.
By the end of 2024, all mobile phones, tablets and cameras sold in the EU will have to be equipped with a USB Type-C charging port. From spring 2026, the obligation will extend to laptops. The new law, adopted by plenary on Tuesday with 602 votes in favour, 13 against and 8 abstentions, is part of a broader EU effort to reduce e-waste and to empower consumers to make more sustainable choices.
Under the new rules, consumers will no longer need a different charger every time they purchase a new device, as they will be able to use one single charger for a whole range of small and medium-sized portable electronic devices.
Regardless of their manufacturer, all new mobile phones, tablets, digital cameras, headphones and headsets, handheld videogame consoles and portable speakers, e-readers, keyboards, mice, portable navigation systems, earbuds and laptops that are rechargeable via a wired cable, operating with a power delivery of up to 100 Watts, will have to be equipped with a USB Type-C port.
All devices that support fast charging will now have the same charging speed, allowing users to charge their devices at the same speed with any compatible charger.
Exemptions will apply for devices that are too small to offer a USB-C port, such as smart watches, health trackers, and some sports equipment, but the legislation is expected to be expanded to other devices over time. Companies will also have to ensure that dedicated labels clearly inform consumers about the charging characteristics of devices they buy.
https://www.macrumors.com/2022/10/04/eu-passes-law-to-switch-iphone-to-usb-c-in-2024/
A TikTok illegal migrant who flaunted welfare cash and called Americans “stupid” has just been DEPORTED! Leonel Moreno, a Venezuelan migrant, gained online fame by bragging about receiving U.S. government benefits while flashing stacks of cash. He openly mocked hardworking Americans, calling them “idiots” while urging other illegal migrants to take advantage of the system.
His arrogance finally caught up to him when authorities deported him back to Venezuela. His outrageous behavior even caused an uproar on a flight, further sealing his fate. Many are celebrating his removal as a major victory for immigration enforcement, especially under Trump’s policies.
Should illegal migrants who abuse the system be deported immediately? Comment below and share your thoughts! Don’t forget to LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for more breaking news and viral updates!
🔔 TURN ON NOTIFICATIONS to stay updated!
Need a lawyer?
If you or someone you know has been injured in an accident, don’t hesitate to ...
I’ve been digging deep into the latest files, and the paperwork I just pulled up is absolutely blinding. Today, I am pulling back the curtain on a massive public relations illusion, and the data completely demolishes the official story. The people running this show genuinely thought they could operate in the shadows, rewrite the narrative on the fly, and expect nobody to actually check their math. But y'all know me—I always check the math! When I put their official public statements side-by-side with the actual sworn filings, the whole story completely unraveled.
Let me tell you how the law works: the rules of evidence and due process are not optional guidelines that people get to ignore whenever it becomes inconvenient for their preferred narrative. You cannot simply weaponize the legal system or withhold crucial facts just because the actual data doesn't fit the story you want to tell. When you build a case on bad faith actions and procedural shortcuts, the law views that as fruit ...
I’ve been going through the latest court dockets, and the paperwork I just pulled up is absolutely blinding. I am looking at a scenario where the people running the show thought they could operate in the shadows, rewrite the narrative on the fly, and expect nobody to check their math. But I always check the math. When I matched their official public statements against the actual sworn filings, the whole story completely unraveled. Bad actors are getting caught on the record contradicting themselves and bending the rules just to protect their own interests.
Let Me Tell You How the Law Works
Let me tell you how the law works: the rules of evidence and due process are not mere suggestions. You cannot simply weaponize the legal system or withhold crucial facts just because the actual data doesn't fit the story you want to tell. When you build a case on bad faith actions and procedural shortcuts, the law views that as fruit from a poisonous tree. You take out that rotten foundation, and the ...
I am breaking down a textbook example of institutional overreach, and the files I just uncovered are crazy, y'all. I have been tracking these specific files closely, and the physical legal documents I just pulled up are absolutely blinding. What started as a standard procedure has officially turned into a situation where bad actors inside the system are completely abusing their authority, fabricating an internal narrative, and rewriting enforcement rules on the fly just to insulate themselves from accountability.
Where the Receipts Get Loud
But here is where the evidence gets incredibly loud, y'all. They genuinely thought they could run this entire playbook behind closed doors, keep the public completely blind, and quietly bury the underlying data. But when I sync up the official timeline and put the actual public records side-by-side, the inconsistency is staggering. They are explicitly caught on the record violating their own established protocols, contradicting their previous public ...
